Kyiv officials dispute Musk’s claim that Ukraine’s military violated Starlink terms
Ukrainian officials disputed Elon Musk’s claim that Ukraine’s military violated Starlink’s terms by using the network for offensive drone strikes. Musk said SpaceX throttled the service and closed a loophole. Defense technology adviser Serhii Beskrestnov said restrictions made medium- and long-range strikes into Russia impossible; former Ukrainian Ministry of Defense adviser Serhiy Sternenko said satellite-communications missions required Starshield.
More context
Kyiv’s officials rejected Musk’s accusation that its armed forces breached Starlink’s service rules through offensive drone use. In a post on X on Saturday, Musk said the military had used the system “for offensive drone strikes to kill people” and that SpaceX had closed the loophole last week. He acknowledged SpaceX had throttled Starlink in Ukraine. Serhiy Sternenko, a former Ukrainian Ministry of Defense adviser, also rejected Musk’s accusation, saying civilian Starlink could not be used for drone missions and missions requiring satellite communications could use only SpaceX’s Starshield.
Was this story useful?
What was the main problem? (optional)
Reporting
- Spectrum News — Ukraine disputes Musk claim it violated Starlink terms
- CBS News — Ukraine disputes Elon Musk's claim that drone strikes violated Starlink's terms
- FOX23 News Tulsa — Ukraine disputes Musk’s claim Starlink was used for offensive drone strikes
- Time — Ukraine’s Satellite Disruption Exposes a Central Risk of Modern Warfare
- newswav.com — Ukraine-Russia war latest: Kyiv questions Elon Musk’s ‘physically impossible’ Starlink claims - Newswav
- egyptindependent.com — Musk accuses Ukraine of violating Starlink’s terms of service following dispute over coverage - Egypt Independent
Verifier’s note
Associated Press reporting carried by Spectrum Local News, CBS News, Fox23/TNND, TIME, Egypt Independent, and The Independent reporting republished by Newswav all describe Ukraine disputing Musk’s claim that it violated Starlink’s terms. These reports are current and do not contradict the central claim.