Justices will review a ruling rejecting the administration's border asylum restrictions
The Supreme Court agreed Friday to decide whether the Trump administration can suspend asylum access at the southern border, taking up its appeal of a federal appeals court ruling that found the policy unlawful. The ban, issued by Donald Trump on Jan. 20, 2025, remains in effect during litigation; the court is expected to rule by the end of June.
Get The Augerton Digest by email.
The proclamation declared an “invasion” at the southern border and suspended entry of noncitizens it described as engaged in it, SCOTUSblog reported. NBC News said one provision allows people crossing without required paperwork to be removed without the ability to claim asylum.
Federal law gives people who fear persecution the right to seek asylum regardless of how they arrived in the United States, The Associated Press reported. The administration argues it can categorically deny applications from migrants covered by the order. Immigration attorneys argue the law requires individual decisions and does not let the president bar applications, PBS News reported.
Was this story useful?
What was the main problem? (optional)
Reporting behind this story
- Bloomberg — Trump Asylum Ban Faces Supreme Court Review After Appeals Court Ruling
- NBC News — Supreme Court to rule on Trump’s asylum ban
- PBS News (with Associated Press) — Supreme Court will consider Trump's executive order suspending asylum access at the southern border
- The Hill — Supreme Court will review legality of Trump's asylum restrictions
- SCOTUSblog — Supreme Court agrees to hear case on Trump administration’s suspension of asylum
- WTOP News — The Latest: Supreme Court to consider Trump’s order suspending asylum access at southern border
- elpasomatters.org (with Associated Press) — Supreme Court will consider Trump's executive order suspending asylum access at the southern border